News | Heart Valve Technology | October 03, 2019

Similar Outcomes for TAVR vs. SAVR in Intermediate Surgical Risk Patients

Five-year results from the PARTNER 2A study reported at TCT 2019

Five-year results from the PARTNER 2A Trial found patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and intermediate surgical risk who underwent Sapien 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) had similar rates of death and disabling stroke compared to those who had surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, TAVR using a transthoracic approach had poorer outcomes compared to SAVR. #TCT2019

October 3, 2019 – Five-year results from the PARTNER 2A Trial found patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and intermediate surgical risk who underwent Sapien 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) had similar rates of death and disabling stroke compared to those who had surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, TAVR using a transthoracic approach had poorer outcomes compared to SAVR.

Findings were reported at the 2019 Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) scientific symposium. 

Two-year results from the PARTNER 2A trial concluded that TAVR was similar to surgery for the primary endpoint of death or disabling stroke in patients with severe AS and intermediate surgical risk. However, there are limited data on longer-term clinical outcomes and bioprosthetic valve function in this population. The goal of the current trial was to compare the key clinical outcomes, bioprosthetic valve function, and quality-of-life measures at five years for TAVR versus surgery.

Researchers randomly assigned 2,032 intermediate-risk patients with severe AS to either TAVR or SAVR at 57 centers. The two-year primary endpoint was all-cause death or disabling stroke in the intention to treat (ITT) population. At five years, all primary and secondary clinical and echo endpoints were analyzed in both ITT and pre-specified as-treated (AT) populations.

At five years, event rates for the primary endpoint of death or disabling stroke were 47.9% after TAVR and 43.4% after SAVR (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.25; P=0.21). In the transfemoral cohort, there also was no difference at five years (44.5% TAVR versus 42.0% SAVR; HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.20; P=0.80).

However, in the transthoracic cohort, the rate of death or disabling stroke was significantly higher after TAVR (59.3% versus 48.3%; HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.71; P=0.03). In addition, early improvements in functional status and quality of life were maintained through five years for both TAVR and SAVR patients.

“In the longest follow-up for intermediate-risk patients with severe AS, TAVR and SAVR had similar rates of death or disabling stroke,” said Vinod H. Thourani, M.D., chair of the Department of Cardiac Surgery at Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute. “Therefore, TAVR should be considered as an alternative to surgery in intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, in patients without acceptable transfemoral access, surgery may be the preferred alternative.”

The PARTNER 2A study was funded by Edward Lifesciences. Dr. Thourani disclosed grant/research support from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, JenaValve and Cryolife; sitting on Steering Committees for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, JenaValve, Cryolife and Gore Vascular; and honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific,JenaValve, Cryolife, and Gore Vascular.

Find information on other late-breaking TCT trials

 

Related PARTNER TAVR Trial Content:

TAVR Cost-Effective Compared With SAVR in Intermediate-Risk Aortic Stenosis Patients

Edwards Completes Enrollment in PARTNER 3 Low-Risk CT Sub-Study

TAVR Outperforms Surgery in Younger, Low-Risk Aortic Stenosis Patients

FDA Approves TAVR for Low-risk Patients Creates A Paradigm Shift in Cardiology

National Coverage Determination Will Make TAVR Available to More Patients at More Centers

 

Related Content

News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

June 24, 2021 — Data captured in American College of Cardiology (ACC) National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) ...

Home June 24, 2021
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

January 27, 2021 — A New York Institute of Technology research team has secured a five-year $1.8 million grant from the ...

Home January 27, 2021
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

July 22, 2020 — Eating chocolate at least once a week is linked with a reduced risk of heart disease, according to ...

Home July 22, 2020
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

July 1, 2020 — Carag AG announced receiving U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Investigational Device Exemption ...

Home July 01, 2020
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

January 20, 2020 — Scientists at Los Alamos and international partners have created the first 3-D images of a special ...

Home January 20, 2020
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

Environmental and lifestyle issues were popular this year, with pick up from both European Society of Cardiology (ESC) ...

Home December 23, 2019
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

November 26, 2019 — The University of Connecticut (UConn) Department of Kinesiology and Hartford Healthcare have ...

Home November 26, 2019
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

July 10, 2019 — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued the final guidance “Live Case Presentations During ...

Home July 10, 2019
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

July 3, 2019 — The American College of Cardiology (ACC) has partnered with Veradigm, an Allscripts business unit, to ...

Home July 03, 2019
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

November 19, 2018 — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to add an exception to informed consent ...

Home November 19, 2018
Home
Subscribe Now